Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 298 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 46 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 15.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 95 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 50 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 830 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 12 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |