Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 178 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 303 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 24 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 14.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.7 l/100km | 14.4 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 450 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 45 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 15 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1150 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`710 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |