Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Ford Maverick 2000
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 202 HP | 124 HP | |
Torque: | 318 NM | 175 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 78 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 143 NM more than Ford Maverick. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.2 | 9.8 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 15.7 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 660 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 58 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
630 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
450 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`940 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |