Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2001 - 2003
Suzuki Grand Vitara
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 165 HP109 HP
Torque: 373 NM270 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.3 secondsn/a seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 56 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.57.3
Real fuel consumption: 10.0 l/100km8.6 l/100km
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 480 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Fuel tank capacity: 90 litres66 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 850 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1030 km on highway1100 km on highway
900 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.20 m
Width: 1.88 m1.78 m
Height: 1.84 m1.74 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger.
Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters10.6 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`8001`850
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

above average
Average price (€): 38002000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • more power
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv