Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 51 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 23 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |