Mitsubishi Pajero 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Nissan X-Trail) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.3 seconds | 13.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 25 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 181 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.0 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 1030 km on highway | 740 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 23 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.4 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`800 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |