Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 engine produces 40 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 12.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 42 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |