Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 engine produces 25 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero 1997. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 12.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero 1997 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 44 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero 1997, which means Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |