Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 63 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 160 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 11.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 135 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 35 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`506 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |