Mitsubishi Pajero 2000 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 100 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 28 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 58 NM more than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 7.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.3 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 30 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi L 200 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.26 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 27 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 670 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |