Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 198 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 4 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 13.1 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`427 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 240 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |