Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Ford Maverick 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 202 HP | 124 HP | |
| Torque: | 318 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 78 HP more power than Ford Maverick, whereas torque is 143 NM more than Ford Maverick. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.8 | 9.8 | |
|
The Ford Maverick is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Maverick, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 600 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Maverick gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.72 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm shorter than the Ford Maverick, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 985 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`015 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Ford Maverick has
| |