Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.1 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 185 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 35 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 77 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.7 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 31 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2047 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.5 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 180 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |