Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 343 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 3 HP less power than Toyota Land Cruiser, but torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 87 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
930 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
710 km with real consumption | 860 km with real consumption | ||
Toyota Land Cruiser gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is 53 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.8 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |