Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Toyota RAV4 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 181 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 530 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine: The 2.0-liter gasoline engine debuted in 2000 as a replacement for the 3S-FE. It features an aluminum block with cast-iron liners and an open cooling jacket, an aluminum 16-valve DOHC cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, and a chain-driven timing system. Most versions of ... More about Toyota RAV4 2000 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 16 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1150 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 75 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |