Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 2 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 27 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.9 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 18 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`688 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |