Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 51 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 103 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 7.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |