Mitsubishi Pajero 2005 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 555 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 34 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |