Mitsubishi Pajero 2005 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1998
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Suzuki Grand Vitara) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 128 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 174 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 13 HP less power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, but torque is 66 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 9.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.3 l/100km | 10.2 l/100km | |
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
790 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
620 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.30 m | 4.20 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.84 m | 1.74 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm longer than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | above average | |
Average price (€): | 4000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |