Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 25 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 555 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2004 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 34 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 10 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Honda CR-V, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda CR-V has
| |