Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 21 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 74 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 480 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 12 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |