Mitsubishi Pajero 2003 vs Hyundai Terracan 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Terracan is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 48 HP less power than Hyundai Terracan, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Hyundai Terracan. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.5 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Hyundai Terracan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Terracan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 790 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Terracan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.71 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 41 cm shorter than the Hyundai Terracan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Pajero is 1.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Terracan, which means Mitsubishi Pajero can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Hyundai Terracan has
| |