Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 198 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 89 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 131 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 7.5 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 885 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |