Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Subaru Forester 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 89 HP more power than Subaru Forester, whereas torque is 143 NM more than Subaru Forester. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 9.3 | |
|
The Subaru Forester is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Forester, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 615 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.59 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 10 cm shorter than the Subaru Forester, 14 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 387 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Subaru Forester has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Subaru Forester, so Subaru Forester quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 3600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Subaru Forester has
| |