Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 46 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 13.2 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 37 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |