Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 46 HP more power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 22 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 13.2 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 37 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1909 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 119 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |