Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 131 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 144 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 5.9 | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 7.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 1125 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 800 | 17 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |