Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 233 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 291 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 14 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 38 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 10.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 15.1 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 780 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`665 kg | 2`170 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |