Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 97 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Skoda Karoq. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 521 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 23 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
| |