Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 97 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 5.5 | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 7.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 1185 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine: The engine is praised for being both flexible and torquey, delivering impressive performance for its horsepower rating. It is also remarkably fuel-efficient. However, the engine is very demanding when it comes ... More about Skoda Karoq 2017 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 1`929 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |