Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Compass 2017
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 247 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 329 NM | 250 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 77 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 79 NM more than Jeep Compass. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 6.9 | |
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 975 litres more fuel. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.39 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.64 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero and Jeep Compass are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 458 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 13 800 | 20 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |