Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Cupra Ateca 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 247 HP | 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 329 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
|
Cupra Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 53 HP less power than Cupra Ateca, whereas torque is 71 NM less than Cupra Ateca. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.4 | 7.4 | |
|
The Cupra Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Cupra Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 900 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Cupra Ateca are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`665 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Cupra Ateca has
| |