Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 381 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 78 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 61 NM more than Volvo XC90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 80 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 290 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 323 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |