Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 165 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 381 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 53 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 129 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 90 litres | 78 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 37 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 688 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |