Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 53 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1837 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |