Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volvo XC90 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.2 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Volvo XC90) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC90 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 73 HP less power than Volvo XC90, but torque is 53 NM more than Volvo XC90. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 11.5 | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC90, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Pajero over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 43 cm shorter than the Volvo XC90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 249 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 215 litres | 613 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1837 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volvo XC90 has more luggage space (by 398 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo XC90 (by 47 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 7600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volvo XC90 has
| |