Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 675 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 2 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1752 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 9800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |