Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota RAV4 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 675 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Toyota RAV4 2009 2.2 engine: The AD-series turbo diesel engines were introduced in Toyota vehicles in 2005 and remained in production until 2018. The first model was a 2.2-liter engine, followed by a 2.0-liter version. Both engines share an 86 mm ... More about Toyota RAV4 2009 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | 1752 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Pajero has 235 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Pajero uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Pajero (by 38 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`190 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |