Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 14.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 58 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, whereas torque is 113 NM more than Land Rover Freelander. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 435 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.71 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 7 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1790 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Land Rover Freelander has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Land Rover Freelander, so Land Rover Freelander quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |