Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 10 HP more power than Land Rover Freelander, but torque is 27 NM less than Land Rover Freelander. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.91 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1790 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 540 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Freelander. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`800 kg | 2`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |