Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 48 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 37 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |