Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 158 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 12 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, but torque is 27 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.9 | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.82 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 12 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`688 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |