Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 7 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.74 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 878 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1790 litres | no data | |
|
Jeep Cherokee has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 663 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`800 kg | 2`520 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |