Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 30 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 600 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine: Honda’s first diesel engine featured an aluminum block, a variable-geometry turbocharger, second-generation Bosch Common Rail injection, 16-valve cylinder head, and a balance shaft integrated into the crankcase. The ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 14 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 200 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |