Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 30 HP more power than Volkswagen Tiguan, whereas torque is 53 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 495 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`165 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |