Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Volkswagen Tiguan 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero and Volkswagen Tiguan have the same engine power, but Mitsubishi Pajero torque is 23 NM more than Volkswagen Tiguan. Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Tiguan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 675 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Tiguan. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Tiguan, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 15 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 000 | 9600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Tiguan has
| |