Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 10.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Land Cruiser is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is smaller. Mitsubishi Pajero is 47 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 8400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 9.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |