Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 54 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 188 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 630 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |