Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.2 Petrol | |
Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 116 HP | |
Torque: | 373 NM | 185 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 54 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 188 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 690 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.39 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.85 m | 1.56 m | |
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 377 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`865 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 200 | 21 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |