Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Toyota C-HR 2016

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 -
Toyota C-HR
2016 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Diesel1.2 Petrol
Diesel (Mitsubishi Pajero) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota C-HR) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences."

Performance

Power: 170 HP116 HP
Torque: 373 NM185 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds11.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 54 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 188 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.55.9
Real fuel consumption: 11.9 l/100km7.3 l/100km
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 690 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.36 m
Width: 1.88 m1.80 m
Height: 1.85 m1.56 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger.
Mitsubishi Pajero is 3 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, 8 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 29 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data377 litres
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`8001`865
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
below average
no data
Average price (€): 14 20021 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • lower price
Toyota C-HR has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv