Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005

 
Mitsubishi Pajero
2006 -
Suzuki Grand Vitara
2005 - 2008
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.2 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 170 HP129 HP
Torque: 373 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds13.2 seconds
Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 41 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.57.7
Real fuel consumption: 11.9 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 420 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 4.39 m4.47 m
Width: 1.88 m1.81 m
Height: 1.85 m1.70 m
Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data398 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1951 litres
Turning diameter: no data11 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`8002`070
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

above average
Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 13 6003000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Pajero has
  • more power
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv