Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 129 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 41 HP more power than Suzuki Grand Vitara, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Suzuki Grand Vitara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 420 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.70 m | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero is 9 cm shorter than the Suzuki Grand Vitara, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 215 litres | 398 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1790 litres | 1951 litres | |
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Pajero has 183 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Grand Vitara. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Grand Vitara (by 161 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`800 kg | 2`070 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`310 kg | 1`660 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 490 kg | 410 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 16 procentiem more than Suzuki Grand Vitara. Therefore, Mitsubishi Pajero is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Suzuki Grand Vitara has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Suzuki Grand Vitara, so Suzuki Grand Vitara quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Suzuki Grand Vitara has
| |