Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Skoda Karoq 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 55 HP more power than Skoda Karoq, whereas torque is 123 NM more than Skoda Karoq. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Karoq is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 915 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Karoq. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero and Skoda Karoq are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1630 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 400 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Skoda Karoq has
| |