Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Seat Ateca. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 915 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 5.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.60 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, 7 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 25 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 21 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |