Mitsubishi Pajero 2006 vs Peugeot 4008 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 1.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero engine produces 20 HP more power than Peugeot 4008, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Peugeot 4008. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Pajero reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.9 l/100km | 7.4 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 4008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Pajero could require 735 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Pajero consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 4008. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is larger. Mitsubishi Pajero is 5 cm longer than the Peugeot 4008, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Pajero is 22 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 416 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1196 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`800 | 2`060 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 200 | 9200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Pajero has
|
Peugeot 4008 has
| |